In response to “Do you prefer to stop the war or win the war?” 42 per cent of respondents in China said the conflict needed to stop as soon as possible, even if it meant Ukraine ceding control of some areas to Russia.
Most respondents from India, Turkey and Russia were also of a similar view – with 54, 48 and 44 per cent, respectively, backing a swift end to hostilities.
In contrast, more people in the European Union, Britain and the United States said Ukraine needed to “regain all its territory”, even if it meant “a longer war or more Ukrainians being killed and displaced”.
On the question of “Which best reflects your view on what Russia is to your country?”, a total of 79 per cent of Chinese respondents chose the options “an ally – that shares our interests and values” or “a necessary partner – with which we must strategically cooperate”.
India and Turkey returned similar results, though more Indians labelled Russia as an ally.
However, more than 70 per cent of respondents from the US, EU and Britain shared a united view on Russia as an “adversary” or “rival”.
Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and other European officials listen to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky address the Munich Security Conference via video link. Photo: Nato/dpa
On why Europe and the US have stood behind Ukraine, more than 40 per cent of Chinese respondents said the aim was “to defend Western dominance”, as did a similar number of Russians.
The results of the poll, carried out over December and January, were published as the world prepared to mark one year since Russia invaded Ukraine last February 24.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky urged world leaders to “speed up support” for his country as he addressed the Munich Security Conference via video link last week.
Top Western leaders including German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron attended the event, as did US Vice-President Kamala Harris, who said Russia had committed “crimes against humanity” in Ukraine.
01:39
US warns China of ‘serious consequences’ if it supplies weapons to Russia for Ukraine war
US President Joe Biden paid a surprise visit to Kyiv in a gesture of solidarity on Monday, a day before top Chinese diplomat Wang Yi’s scheduled trip to Russia.
Biden also pledged a new military package worth US$500 million as Russian forces made a new push to control Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region.
Wang, whose trip to Moscow included a meeting with President Vladimir Putin, said China was ready to deepen strategic cooperation with Russia.
Bilateral ties had “withstood pressure” and would not be swayed by any “third party”, said Wang – the most senior Chinese official to visit Moscow since the Russian invasion.
Putin told Wang that Russia-China cooperation was important to stabilise the international situation, according to the Kremlin.
01:46
China and Russia reaffirm ‘rock solid’ ties at meeting in Moscow
The United Nations has deplored the human cost of the Ukraine war, which has killed more than 8,000 civilians and injured close to 13,300, according to UN human rights high commissioner Volker Türk. It has also displaced some 14 million people and left nearly 18 million in dire need of humanitarian assistance, Türk said.
The recent opinion poll on the war, a collaborative effort between the ECFR and the “Europe in a changing world” project at the University of Oxford, covered 19,765 respondents across nine EU countries, Great Britain, the United States, China, India, Turkey and Russia.
In China, the poll was conducted through online surveys by Gallup International Association in partnership with local organisations, covering respondents from Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou and Shenzhen.
The report pointed out that the data was largely urban-centric for China, Russia and India, and “should be considered as representative only for the population covered by the poll”.
It closed with the disclaimer that, “considering the poll scope and questionnaire, the results from Russia and China need to be interpreted with caution, bearing in mind the possibility that some respondents might have felt constrained in expressing their opinions freely”.
